Faith Docs

Pastor Pay, Housing Allowance & Clergy Tax

The Board Resolution That Designates a Housing Allowance

Published · Pastor Pay, Housing Allowance & Clergy Tax

Short answer: a housing allowance board resolution is the formal, dated record that your governing body set aside part of a minister's pay as housing. It has to name the minister, state an amount or a formula, be adopted by the body your bylaws give authority over compensation, and be dated in advance of the pay it covers (IRS, Ministers' Compensation & Housing Allowance). If it isn't in the minutes, from the church's side it didn't happen.

Someone is going to ask for it eventually. A new treasurer, an accountant preparing the minister's return, a board member doing their first careful read of the minutes. The question is always some version of the same thing: *where is that written down?*

If the answer is an email, a verbal understanding, or "we've always done it that way," the church has a problem it can fix in twenty minutes at the next meeting. But only going forward, which is the whole subject of why a housing allowance must be designated in advance.

What the resolution actually is

The housing allowance isn't something a minister claims on their own. It's something the church does. The church decides, before it pays the money, that a stated portion of the minister's compensation is designated for housing (IRC §107, Rental value of parsonages).

The resolution is the artifact of that decision. It isn't a form the IRS issues and it isn't filed anywhere. It's your own corporate record, and its entire job is to prove three things:

  1. Who decided: the body with authority under your governing documents.
  2. What they decided: a specific minister, a specific amount or formula, a specific period.
  3. When they decided it: a date that comes before the compensation it applies to is earned.

That third one is where most churches come unstuck, and it isn't recoverable after the fact.

The five things a defensible resolution contains

The minister by name and role. "The Pastor" is weaker than a name plus the position. If you have more than one minister, each needs their own designation. A single blanket resolution covering "our ministerial staff" gives you nothing to point at per person.

An amount or a stated formula. Either a dollar figure for the period, or a method that produces one without further judgment ("40% of total compensation"). Language like "an appropriate housing allowance" isn't a designation. It's an intention.

The period it covers. Usually the calendar year. Say so explicitly, and say when it starts.

The date of the vote. This is the load-bearing element. The resolution must be adopted before the compensation it covers is earned and paid.

A continuing clause, if you want one. Many churches add language stating the designation continues at the same amount for following years until the board changes it. That's useful protection against the year everyone forgets, but it isn't a substitute for revisiting the number, because the amount should still track what the minister actually spends.

Who has the authority to adopt it

Read your bylaws before you assume. In most churches, compensation sits with the board or the elders acting as a body. In some it sits with a compensation committee holding delegated authority. In a few, the bylaws reserve compensation to the membership at an annual meeting, and in that case a board vote alone wouldn't be enough.

Two things are almost never sufficient on their own:

If nobody can say for certain which body holds the authority, resolve that question first. It's a governing-documents problem wearing a payroll costume.

How churches get this wrong

Almost never through bad intent. The pattern is nearly always that no single person owned the task.

The trigger that exposes all five is the same: tax season, a new treasurer, or an audit of the minutes.

What to do if this year was missed

Be straight about the position. You can't fix the part of the year that has already been paid. The allowance applies prospectively, to compensation earned after the designation. What you can do is stop the loss and prevent a repeat.

  1. Adopt a designation now, covering the remainder of the current year. Everything earned from that date forward is covered.
  2. Adopt next year's designation before the year begins. Most boards do it at the same meeting where they approve the budget.
  3. Put it on the annual calendar as a fixed agenda item, so it doesn't depend on anyone remembering.
  4. File it with the corporate records, not in an inbox.

If your minutes are thin generally, not just on this, that's worth fixing at the same time. The board minutes and resolutions are where a church's decisions become provable.

Designating a number does not create a benefit

Worth stating plainly, because boards sometimes reach for a large figure thinking it helps. The amount a minister can actually exclude is limited to the lowest of three things: the amount designated, the actual housing costs paid, and the fair rental value of the home furnished, plus utilities (IRS Publication 517).

The resolution sets a ceiling. The other two limits still bind underneath it. Designating an unrealistically high number doesn't produce a larger benefit. It just produces a number that doesn't survive contact with the minister's actual expenses. We walk through all three limits in the housing allowance playbook.

What the resolution should not say

Three habits weaken an otherwise sound resolution.

Conditional language. "The board intends to designate" or "may designate up to" isn't a designation. The minutes should record a decision that was made, not one that is contemplated. Move it, second it, carry it.

A number with no anchor. A figure that appears from nowhere invites the question of where it came from. The minister supplies a written estimate of their housing costs; the board decides on the basis of it. Both steps belong in the record: the estimate in the file, the decision in the minutes.

Reimbursement framing. A housing allowance is a designation of compensation the church is already paying. It isn't a reimbursement of expenses and it shouldn't be worded like one, because reimbursements are a different mechanism with different rules. That's what the accountable reimbursement plan is for, and mixing the two blurs both.

A worked example

A church pays its pastor a total of sixty thousand dollars a year. In November, before the new year begins, the board meets and passes a resolution designating twenty-four thousand dollars of the following year's compensation as housing allowance, based on the pastor's written estimate of mortgage, utilities, insurance and upkeep.

Through the year the pastor actually spends twenty-two thousand on housing. The fair rental value of the home, furnished and with utilities, is twenty-six thousand.

The exclusion is the lowest of the three figures: twenty-two thousand, the amount actually spent. The remaining two thousand of the designation is simply compensation, reported as normal (IRS Topic no. 417, Earnings for clergy). Nothing has gone wrong; the ceiling was set slightly high and the actual spend governed.

Now change one fact. The board passes the same resolution the following September instead. Everything earned January to August is outside it, because the designation only reaches forward. The pastor's position for two-thirds of that year is as though no designation existed. That's the whole cost of a late vote, and no later paperwork changes it.

Common questions

Does the resolution have to be renewed every year?

Not if it contains a continuing clause stating the designation carries at the same amount until changed. Many churches include one specifically to survive the year everybody forgets. Even so, review the number annually. A designation that no longer resembles the minister's actual housing costs isn't doing its job, and reviewing it is a four-minute agenda item.

What if the minister's housing costs change mid-year?

The board can adopt a revised designation, and it takes effect from that point forward. It doesn't re-characterize pay already earned under the old figure. If a minister buys a house in June, adopt a new designation in June rather than waiting for the year end.

Can one resolution cover two ministers?

It can, provided it names each minister individually with their own amount. What doesn't work is a single figure covering "ministerial staff" collectively. There's then no per-person designation to point at, and the church can't show what was designated for whom.

Who keeps the record?

The church, in its corporate records, with the minutes. Give the minister a copy as well so they aren't asking the office for it at tax time. Both parties holding the same document is the point.

Make it a four-minute annual habit

The churches that never have this problem all do the same unremarkable thing: the housing allowance designation is a standing agenda item at a specific meeting every year, next to the budget. Someone moves it, someone seconds it, it's recorded, it's done.

That really is the whole solution. This isn't a hard area of law. It's an administrative discipline problem, and a calendar entry fixes it. For the wider picture, the housing allowance hub collects the rules in one place, and then you can decide when in your year to set it.

---

Get the resolution right, once. The Housing Allowance Designation is the board resolution and the recordkeeping sheet written for exactly this. Fill in the minister, the amount and the date, adopt it at your next meeting, and file it with your minutes. $49, instant download.

*Faith Docs provides self-help document templates, not legal advice. We are not a law firm. For representation, consult a licensed attorney.*

The document for this, ready to fill in.

Faith Docs sells the fill-in-the-blank templates churches actually need — drafted by church attorneys, yours to download the moment you buy.

Browse all documents →